Atto 8 Premium FWD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 163080
SAR 149327
SAR 156900
SAR 143635
SAR 2195
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.03 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 30.87
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 132.3
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1609.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20
/
5040
4760 mm
1996
1930 mm
1760
1927 mm
2950
2750 mm
5.9 M
/
165 mm
224 m
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
34.7
10 Km/L
60
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PU
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
10
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Battery/Charging
40
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double Wishbone Type
/
Five-link
/
Wheels/brakes
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
275
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport / Normal / Eco
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
