Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LT vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 83803
SAR 88183
SAR 80615
SAR 84812
SAR 1128
SAR 1187
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 22.55
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 18.04
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 157.85
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 126.28
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 676.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 541.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 8230.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6584.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4655
4.574
1835
1.876
1760
1.685
2750
2.720
/
463
Fuel Economy
10.2
12.2
52
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
144 BHP - 264 BHP
127 - 258 BHP
Automatic & CVT
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
149 BHP
231 BHP
255
360
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
