Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LT vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 83803
SAR 88118
SAR 80615
SAR 84790
SAR 1128
SAR 1186
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 22.55
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.79
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 157.85
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 676.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 473.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 8230.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5761.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
190 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4655
4571 mm
1835
1855 mm
1760
1719 mm
2750
2708 mm
/
18
/
430 L
/
145
Fuel Economy
10.2
14.7 Km/L
52
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
144 BHP - 264 BHP
169 BHP - 220 BHP
Automatic & CVT
7DCT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
149 BHP
171 BHP
255
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
