Coolray 2025 GF vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 94797
SAR 180471
SAR 91184
SAR 173654
SAR 1276
SAR 2429
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4980 mm
1810 mm
1950 mm
1615 mm
1780 mm
2600 mm
2920 mm
330 L
/
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
45 L
66 L
16 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
2
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172
248 BHP
290 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
