Coolray 2025 GL vs Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 80601
TBD
SAR 77501
TBD
SAR 1085
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
N/A, Electric
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
6 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
5209
1810 mm
2010
1615 mm
1731
2600 mm
3110
330 L
/
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
/
45 L
/
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
429 BHP
290 Nm
600
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
