Model 3 Rear Wheel Drive vs 3.5 Gasoline Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Price Comparison
SAR 190943
SAR 190860
SAR 183715
SAR 183600
SAR 2570
SAR 2569
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 474.92
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
225 km/h
/
American
/
/
3,470
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4720 mm
5050
2089 mm
1880
1441 mm
1480
2875 mm
2895
682 L
/
138 m
/
/
1624
/
1631
Fuel Economy
/
13.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
/
MacPherson Strut
/
MacPherson Strut
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
325 BHP
296
420 Nm
36.6
/
3.5
/
6,400
/
5,000
Motor
10.5
/
options.Lithium-Ion
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
