Qin L 80KM Lead vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 49925
TBD
SAR 48022
TBD
SAR 672
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.88
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 41.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 176.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2146.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
/
4390 mm
/
1725 mm
/
1468 mm
/
2535 mm
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
25
13 Km/L
/
45 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
E-CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
101 BHP
105 BHP
/
145 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
