Territory Titanium vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 135891
SAR 149327
SAR 130755
SAR 143635
SAR 1829
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1798 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4630 mm
4760 mm
1935 mm
1930 mm
1706 mm
1927 mm
2726 mm
2750 mm
385 L
400 L
190 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
15.9
10 Km/L
60 L
75 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
✓
All Liquid Cluster
/
✓
✓
Leather Trim
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
8
9
/
Android LCD
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
190 BHP
224 BHP
320
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
