GR86 A/T 2.4L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 144650
SAR 149327
SAR 139150
SAR 143635
SAR 1947
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4265 mm
4760 mm
1775 mm
1930 mm
1310 mm
1927 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
13.4
10 Km/L
50 L
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
228 BHP
224 BHP
250 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
