Urban Cruiser GL X vs Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
SAR 95763
SAR 98360
SAR 92115
SAR 94599
SAR 1289
SAR 1324
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 220.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
180
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4295
1795
1960
1645
1590
2600
2620
210
/
/
432
Fuel Economy
19.8
15.4
45
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101
118 BHP
135
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
