X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 105800
SAR 95620
SAR 101800
SAR 92000
SAR 1424
SAR 1287
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.53
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 31.57
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 94.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 220.99
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 405.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 947.1
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4938.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 11523.05
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
4
5
4680
4400 mm
2065
1830 mm
1730
1590 mm
2705
2630 mm
212
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
7.1
55
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
4
6
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
194 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
290
244 @ 4,000
/
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
