X55 LV2 vs MG ZS 2022 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 63293
SAR 66940
SAR 60861
SAR 64400
SAR 852
SAR 901
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1550
/
4620
4.314
1886
1.809
1680
1.624
2735
2.585
1970
/
350
448
160
/
/
✓
Fuel Economy
53
48
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dual Airbags
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver And Passenger
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission
Automatic
✓
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson Independent Suspension
/
Multi-Link Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
A156T2H
/
305
150
/
112 BHP
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
