Attrage 1.2 GLS vs EMPOW GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Dynamic and attractive design
- Powerful performance and high efficiency
- Provides advanced technologies and comprehensive security
Negative
- Limited storage space at the back
- Infotainment interface needs minor improvements
- Rear seats may be cramped for some passengers
Price Comparison
SAR 39217
SAR 99405
SAR 37682
SAR 95623
SAR 528
SAR 1338
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 227.85
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.42
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245 mm
4700
1670 mm
1850
1515 mm
1432
2550 mm
2730
450 L
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
20 Km/L
18
42 L
47
20 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
7 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
6
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
4
8
/
10.25 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
7-Speed DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
MacPherson strut with stabilizer
McPherson independent Suspension
Torsion beam
Multi-link Beam Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc (ventilated)
/
Drum (leading & trailing)
/
185/55R15
225/45 R18
185/55R15
225/45 R18
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
170 BHP
100 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
