Attrage 1.2 GLS vs Hongqi H9 2023 2.0T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 39217
SAR 248300
SAR 37682
SAR 238900
SAR 528
SAR 3342
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
250
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245 mm
5137
1670 mm
1904
1515 mm
1493
2550 mm
3060
450 L
/
Fuel Economy
20 Km/L
14.1
42 L
62
20 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut with stabilizer
/
Torsion beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc (ventilated)
/
Drum (leading & trailing)
/
185/55R15
/
185/55R15
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
252 BHP
100 Nm
380
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
