Attrage 1.2 GLX HL vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 39217
SAR 217026
SAR 37682
SAR 208826
SAR 528
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 21.07
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 147.46
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 653.02
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7688.73
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
210
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245 mm
5040
1670 mm
1905
1515 mm
1479
2550 mm
3052
450 L
455
Fuel Economy
20 Km/L
9.3
42 L
70
20 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut with stabilizer
/
Torsion beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc (ventilated)
/
Drum (leading & trailing)
/
185/55R15
/
185/55R15
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
300 BHP
100 Nm
358
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
