Ciaz 1.5L GL vs Renault Symbol 2020 1.6L LE Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 55201
SAR 56976
SAR 53102
SAR 54780
SAR 743
SAR 767
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4490 mm
4354
1730 mm
1994
1475 mm
1529
2650 mm
2635
480 L
510
160 m
/
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
15.6
43 L
50
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard LCD
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
103 BHP
102 BHP
138 Nm
145
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
