Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs ET5 Standard Range Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Modern exterior and interior design
- Advanced high-tech and intelligent systems
- Comfortable and stable driving experience
Negative
- High pricing and value-for-money concerns
- Limited charging network and infrastructure
- Insufficient aftersales service and maintenance support
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 212196
TBD
SAR 204177
TBD
SAR 2856
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 501.27
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5040
4790
1905
1960
1479
1499
3052
2888 mm
455
options. L
/
4 Doors
/
options. mm
Fuel Economy
9.3
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
300 BHP
320 BHP
358
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
