ES 300h vs ET5 Standard Range Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- Modern exterior and interior design
- Advanced high-tech and intelligent systems
- Comfortable and stable driving experience
Negative
- High pricing and value-for-money concerns
- Limited charging network and infrastructure
- Insufficient aftersales service and maintenance support
Price Comparison
SAR 205723
SAR 212196
SAR 197915
SAR 204177
SAR 2769
SAR 2856
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 302.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4975 mm
4790
1865 mm
1960
1445 mm
1499
2870 mm
2888 mm
/
options. L
/
options. mm
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
/
50 L
/
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
E-CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
Hybrid
Electric
None
/
4
/
214 BHP
320 BHP
356 Nm
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
