G318 Standard vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 116791
SAR 149327
SAR 112354
SAR 143635
SAR 1572
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5010
4760 mm
1985
1930 mm
1895
1927 mm
2880
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
16.3
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
252 BHP
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
