Grand Creta Smartstream G2.0L 2025 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 94428
SAR 149327
SAR 90838
SAR 143635
SAR 1271
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 455.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 455.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1999 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4500 mm
4760 mm
1790 mm
1930 mm
1670 mm
1927 mm
2760 mm
2750 mm
433 L
400 L
190 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
50 L
75 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
120 BHP
224 BHP
151 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
