Grand i10 1.2 FLT vs 001 Long Range RWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- The cost is moderate compared to the class
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- The storage space is small
- The interior material is not of high quality
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 41385
TBD
SAR 39822
TBD
SAR 557
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1420
/
3995
4970
1680
1999
1510
1560
2450
3005
/
Flush Door
/
21
/
5
/
539 L
/
174 mm
Fuel Economy
18.1
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
Electric
Interior
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
8.8
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
OLED
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport Style
Safety
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
/
1
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Optional
/
Rear Drive
/
Double Wishbone Independent Suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated
/
Ventilated
/
255/45 R21
/
255/45 R21
Engine
1.2 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
83 BHP
272 BHP
114
/
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
343 Nm
/
✓
/
1
/
3.3 kW
/
✓
/
Left Fuel Tank Port
/
Left Fender
/
176.6
/
5.5
/
Lithium Ferrophosphate
/
CATL
/
Single Motor
/
PMSM
/
200
/
272
/
Rear
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
SPORT, ECO, COMFORT, CUSTOM
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
