H6 Active vs Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
SAR 95320
SAR 98360
SAR 91698
SAR 94599
SAR 1283
SAR 1324
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.79
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.53
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.5
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 94.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 473.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 405.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5761.53
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4938.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
/
180
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4295
/
1960
/
1590
/
2620
/
432
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
15.4
/
41
Comfort
✓
✓
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
/
No
/
es
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
8 + DTS
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
118 BHP
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
149
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
