H9 High vs HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship (Two Tone) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 137740
SAR 140200
SAR 132498
SAR 134900
SAR 1854
SAR 1887
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1990 cc
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4655 mm
1930 mm
1900 mm
1960 mm
1668 mm
2800 mm
2770 mm
750 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
17
90 L
/
9.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
12.6
10
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
8-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/55 R19
/
265/55 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
248 BHP
380 Nm
380 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
