Tank 300 Challenger vs 500 Signature 3.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Luxury interior design
- Equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Large size hinders maneuverability
- Relatively high price
Price Comparison
SAR 155277
TBD
SAR 149385
TBD
SAR 2090
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 19.11
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 133.77
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 573.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6975.15
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
2899 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760
4886 mm
1930
1934 mm
1927
1905 mm
2750
2850 mm
400 L
545 L
224
224 m
Fuel Economy
12.1
8 Km/L
75 L
80 L
10 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
348 BHP
387 Nm
500 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
