Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs 500 Signature 2.0T HEV Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Luxury interior design
- Equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Large size hinders maneuverability
- Relatively high price
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5100
5078 mm
1994
1934 mm
1756
1905 mm
3010
2850 mm
566
795 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.1
15 Km/L
/
80 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
14.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
345 BHP
342 BHP
500
648 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
