MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 110624
SAR 149327
SAR 106420
SAR 143635
SAR 1489
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4923
4760 mm
1930
1930 mm
1810
1927 mm
2850
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
220 BHP
224 BHP
360
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
