Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 162406
SAR 149327
SAR 156228
SAR 143635
SAR 2186
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.02 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 2.94
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 20.58
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 91.14
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 455.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1073.1
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4695 mm
4760 mm
1800 mm
1930 mm
1710 mm
1927 mm
2670 mm
2750 mm
463 L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
62.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
43 L
75 L
62.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
236 BHP
224 BHP
300 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
