Porsche Macan 2024 T vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 351430
SAR 95620
SAR 338149
SAR 92000
SAR 4730
SAR 1287
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 17.24
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 26.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 120.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 187.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 534.29
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 831.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6290.78
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9785.65
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
232
180 km/h
4
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4696
4400 mm
1923
1830 mm
1624
1590 mm
2807
2630 mm
488
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
11.4
7.1
65
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
265 BHP
194 BHP
400
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
