Q3 35 TFSI vs Monjaro 2026 GK 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and luxurious exterior design
- An elaborate interior with modern technologies
- Spacious and comfortable space inside the car
Negative
- Relatively rigid suspension affects comfort
- Noise insulation needs to be improved
- Storage design and details need to be developed
Price Comparison
SAR 152449
SAR 155940
SAR 146644
SAR 149999
SAR 2052
SAR 2099
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.53
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 27.06
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 94.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 189.42
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 405.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 811.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4938.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9876.9
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4385 mm
4770 mm
2019 mm
1895 mm
1608 mm
1689 mm
2603 mm
2845 mm
460 L
562 L
/
20
/
4 Doors
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
58 L
62 L
15.4 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Perforated Vinyl
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
Inifity
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
238
250 Nm
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
