QX60 Sensory vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2020 4.6L GXR3 LS Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 297116
SAR 298672
SAR 285880
SAR 287357
SAR 3999
SAR 4020
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 20.58
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 144.06
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 617.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7511.7
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
/
8
Dimensions
7
8 Seater
5033
5.170
1981
1.980
1770
1.930
2900
2.850
170
/
/
✓
/
456
Fuel Economy
8.7
6.9
/
138
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
4.6 L
Gasoline
Petrol
279
304 BHP
350
439
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
