T01 Adventurer-copy vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 127048
SAR 149327
SAR 122237
SAR 143635
SAR 1710
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2150
/
17"
/
4705
4760 mm
1895
1930 mm
1936
1927 mm
2860
2750 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
224 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
10 Km/L
80
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
✓
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3-inch
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
248 BHP
224 BHP
410
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
