Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs MG ZS 2022 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 63672
SAR 66940
SAR 61260
SAR 64400
SAR 857
SAR 901
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
10.9
/
✓
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
17
✓
5
/
4318
4.314
1831
1.809
1662
1.624
2610
2.585
/
448
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
1.5L
/
111 BHP
112 BHP
/
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
