X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 121770
SAR 149327
SAR 117150
SAR 143635
SAR 1639
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4838
4760 mm
1914
1930 mm
1775
1927 mm
2830
2750 mm
510 L
400 L
210 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
57 L
75 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
254
224 BHP
390 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
