Xforce GT CVT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 94578
SAR 149327
SAR 90986
SAR 143635
SAR 1273
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390
4760 mm
1810
1930 mm
1660
1927 mm
2650
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
42
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
6
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
224 BHP
141
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
