06 Hyper Pro vs Tucson 2025 Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
SAR 93460
SAR 93393
SAR 89900
SAR 89865
SAR 1258
SAR 1257
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 17.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 120.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 402.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 517.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6290.78
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
1596 cc
/
200 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
4350
4500 mm
1820
1865 mm
1625
1650 mm
2640
2680 mm
/
4 Doors
/
620 L
/
210 m
Fuel Economy
15
11 Km/L
51
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
Dual
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.25
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
L
In-Line
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
4
181 BHP
177 BHP
133
/
5500
/
290
264 Nm
2000-3500
/
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
