6 Pure vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 90634
SAR 217026
SAR 87167
SAR 208826
SAR 1220
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 21.07
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 147.46
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 653.02
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7688.73
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
210
4
6
2488 cc
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4870 mm
5040
1840 mm
1905
1450 mm
1479
2830 mm
3052
419 L
455
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
9.3
62 L
70
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
185 BHP
300 BHP
250 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
