Attrage 1.2 GLX HL vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Price Comparison
SAR 39217
SAR 50522
SAR 37682
SAR 48609
SAR 528
SAR 680
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 474.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
170 km/h
/
4
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245 mm
4300 mm
1670 mm
1700 mm
1515 mm
1460 mm
2550 mm
2570 mm
450 L
475 L
/
4 Doors
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
20 Km/L
13
42 L
43 L
20 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
4
6
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson strut with stabilizer
/
Torsion beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc (ventilated)
/
Drum (leading & trailing)
/
185/55R15
/
185/55R15
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
95 BHP
100 Nm
133 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
