Baleno 1.5L GLX vs Hongqi H9 2023 2.0T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- A budget-friendly price
- Stylish exterior design
Negative
- Power performance on highways is limited
- The quality of interior materials is modest
- Sound insulation can be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 69915
SAR 248300
SAR 67275
SAR 238900
SAR 941
SAR 3342
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.02
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.79
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.14
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 270.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 473.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3292.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5761.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
250
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
965/985
/
16
/
4
/
3990
5137
1745
1904
1500
1493
2520
3060
355 L
/
150
/
Fuel Economy
22.7
14.1
37 L
62
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
LCD
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
SRS front, side & curtain airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
4AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
103 BHP
252 BHP
138
380
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Auto
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
