Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) vs MG ZS 2022 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 66938
SAR 66940
SAR 64389
SAR 64400
SAR 901
SAR 901
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
10.9
/
✓
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4.314
1810
1.809
1670
1.624
2560
2.585
348
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13.9
17.2
52
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
123 BHP
112 BHP
160
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
