Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
SAR 92790
SAR 93393
SAR 89250
SAR 89865
SAR 1249
SAR 1257
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.23
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.23
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 92.61
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 92.61
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 396.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 396.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4828.95
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4828.95
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
4
/
1596 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4650
4500 mm
1850
1865 mm
1705
1650 mm
2700
2680 mm
590
620 L
/
4 Doors
/
210 m
Fuel Economy
11.4
11 Km/L
58
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
175 BHP
177 BHP
230
264 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
