Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LT vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 83803
SAR 88183
SAR 80615
SAR 84812
SAR 1128
SAR 1187
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 19.15
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 134.05
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 574.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 459.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6989.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4655
4.574
1835
1.876
1760
1.685
2750
2.720
/
463
Fuel Economy
10.2
12.2
52
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
149 BHP
231 BHP
255
360
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
