Coolray 2025 GF vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 94797
SAR 142496
SAR 91184
SAR 137080
SAR 1276
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4722
1810 mm
1860
1615 mm
1705
2600 mm
2710
330 L
/
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
14.9
45 L
/
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
2
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172
254 BHP
290 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
