Coolray 2025 GF+ vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 96365
SAR 142496
SAR 92724
SAR 137080
SAR 1297
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4722
1810 mm
1860
1615 mm
1705
2600 mm
2710
330 L
/
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
14.9
45 L
/
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
2
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172
254 BHP
290 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
