Coolray 2025 GL vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 80601
SAR 142496
SAR 77501
SAR 137080
SAR 1085
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 267.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 312.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4722
1810 mm
1860
1615 mm
1705
2600 mm
2710
330 L
/
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
14.9
45 L
/
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
254 BHP
290 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
