Everest 2025 Limited vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 211597
SAR 149327
SAR 203582
SAR 143635
SAR 2848
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.23
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 92.61
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 410.13
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 455.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4828.95
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2296 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4914
4760 mm
2207
1930 mm
1842
1927 mm
2900
2750 mm
259 L
400 L
225
224 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
80 L
75 L
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
12
9
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed Selectshift AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.3
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
296 BHP
224 BHP
420 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
