H6 GT 4WD vs Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
SAR 95320
SAR 98360
SAR 91698
SAR 94599
SAR 1283
SAR 1324
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
/
180
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
5
/
4714
4295
1940
1960
1729
1590
165
/
/
2620
/
432
Fuel Economy
/
15.4
/
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Intelligent Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7
/
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0L
/
208 BHP
118 BHP
325
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Race Mode + (standard/sport/ECO/snow/sand/off-road)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
