Hiace Bus Gasoline MT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 154825
SAR 149327
SAR 148925
SAR 143635
SAR 2084
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
13
5 Seater
16
/
5915
4760 mm
1950
1930 mm
2280
1927 mm
3860
2750 mm
3640
/
6.4m
/
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
70
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
235/65R16C
/
235/65R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
277
224 BHP
351
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
