Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Toyota Hiace 2022 2.8L Commuter M/T Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 155420
SAR 150517
SAR 149500
SAR 144785
SAR 2092
SAR 2026
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
/
2360
/
16
/
5915
5915
1950
1950
2280
2280
3860
3860
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
/
70
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.8
2755 L
Diesel
Diesel
174
154 BHP
450
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
