HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 105056
SAR 108920
SAR 101079
SAR 104800
SAR 1414
SAR 1466
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 282.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 241.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4630
4680
1890
2065
1663
1730
2750
2705
507
/
/
17
/
4
/
212
Fuel Economy
13.5
16.1
65
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
9AT
CVT
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
✓
/
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
231
181 BHP
370
244
/
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 @ 6,000
/
244 @ 4,000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
