Cerato 1.6L EX vs Hongqi H9 2023 2.0T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 94430
SAR 248300
SAR 90848
SAR 238900
SAR 1271
SAR 3342
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
250
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
5137
1800
1904
1440
1493
2700
3060
427
/
Fuel Economy
14.9
14.1
53
62
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
252 BHP
154
380
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
